\section{Structures} \definition{} A \textit{language} is a set of meaningless objects. Here are a few examples: \begin{itemize} \item $\{a, b, ..., z\}$ \item $\{0, 1\}$ \item $\mathbb{Z}$, $\mathbb{R}$, etc. \end{itemize} Every language comes with the equality check $=$, which checks if two elements are the same. \definition{} A \textit{structure} over a language $\mathcal{L}$ consists of a set of symbols. \par The purpose of a structure is to give a language meaning. \vspace{2mm} Symbols generally come in three types: \begin{itemize} \item Constant symbols, which let us specify specific elements of our language. \par Examples: $0, 1, \frac{1}{2}, \pi$ \vspace{2mm} \item Function symbols, which let us navigate between elements of our language. \par Examples: $+, \times, \sin{x}, \sqrt{x}$ \vspace{2mm} \item Relation symbols, which let us compare elements of our language. \par Examples: $<, >, \leq, \geq$ \par The symbol $=$ is \textbf{not} a relation. Why? \hint{See \ref{def:language}} \vspace{2mm} \end{itemize} \vspace{3mm} \example{} \def\structgeneric{\ensuremath{}} The first structure we'll look at is the following: $$ \Bigl( \mathbb{Z} ~\big|~ \{0, 1, +, -, <\} \Bigr) $$ \vspace{2mm} This is a structure over $\mathbb{Z}$ with the following symbols: \begin{itemize} \item Constants: \tab $\{0, 1\}$ \item Functions: \tab $\{+, -\}$ \item Relations: \tab $\{<\}$ \end{itemize} \vspace{2mm} If you look at our set of constant symbols, you'll see that the only integers we can directly refer to in this structure are 0 and 1. If we want any others, we must define them using the tools the structure offers. \vspace{1mm} Say we want the number 2. We could use the function $+$ to define it: $2 \coloneqq [x \text{ where } 1 + 1 = x]$ \par We would write this as $2 \coloneqq [x \text{ where } +(1, 1) = x]$ in proper \say{functional} notation. \problem{} Can we define $-1$ in $\Bigl( \mathbb{Z} ~\big|~ \{0, 1, +, -, <\} \Bigr)$? If so, how? \vfill \problem{} Can we define $-1$ in $\Bigl( \mathbb{Z} ~\big|~ \{0, +, -, <\} \Bigr)$? \par \hint{In this problem, $1$ has been removed from the set of constant symbols.} \vfill \pagebreak Let us formalize what we found in the previous two problems. \par \definition{} A \textit{formula} in a structure $S$ is a well-formed string of constants, functions, and relations. \par \vspace{2mm} You already know what a \say{well-formed} string is: $1 + 1$ is fine, $\sqrt{+}$ is nonsense. \par For the sake of time, I will not provide a formal definition. It isn't particularly interesting. \definition{Definable Elements} Say $S$ is a structure over a language $\mathcal{L}$. \par We say an element $e$ of $\mathcal{L}$ is \textit{definable in $S$} if we can write a formula that only $e$ satisfies. \problem{} Can we define 2 in the structure $\Bigl( \mathbb{Z^+} ~\big|~ \{4, \times \} \Bigr)$? \par \hint{$\mathbb{Z}^+ = \{1, 2, 3, ...\}$} \begin{solution} $-2 \notin \mathbb{Z}^+$, so $2$ can be defined by $[x \text{ where } x \times x = 4]$. \end{solution} \vfill \problem{} Can we define 2 in the structure $\Bigl( \mathbb{Z} ~\big|~ \{4, \times \} \Bigr)$? \begin{solution} No. We could try $[x \text{ where } x \times x = 4]$, but this is satisfied by both $2$ and $-2$. \\ We have no way to distinguish between negative and positive numbers. \end{solution} \vfill \problem{} What numbers are definable in the structure $\Bigl( \mathbb{R} ~\big|~ \{1, 2, \div \} \Bigr)$? \begin{solution} With the tools we have so far, we can only define powers of two, positive and negative. \end{solution} \vfill \pagebreak