Edits
This commit is contained in:
parent
39fafb4869
commit
acfb95831e
@ -174,11 +174,6 @@ Say $[x] = [\nicefrac{2}{3}, \nicefrac{1}{3}]$ and $[y] = [\nicefrac{3}{4}, \nic
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\problem{}
|
|
||||||
With $x$ and $y$ defined as above, find the probability of measuring each of \texttt{00}, \texttt{01}, \texttt{10}, and \texttt{11}.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\vfill
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\problem{}
|
\problem{}
|
||||||
Say $[x] = [\nicefrac{2}{3}, \nicefrac{1}{3}]$ and $[y] = [\nicefrac{3}{4}, \nicefrac{1}{4}]$. \par
|
Say $[x] = [\nicefrac{2}{3}, \nicefrac{1}{3}]$ and $[y] = [\nicefrac{3}{4}, \nicefrac{1}{4}]$. \par
|
||||||
What is the probability that $x$ and $y$ produce different outcomes?
|
What is the probability that $x$ and $y$ produce different outcomes?
|
||||||
@ -324,27 +319,30 @@ In other words, what is the set of vectors that can be written as linear combina
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
\vfill
|
\vfill
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Look through the above problems and convince yourself of the following fact: \par
|
% This is wrong, but there's something here.
|
||||||
If $a$ is a basis of $A$ and $b$ is a basis of $B$, $a \otimes b$ is a basis of $A \times B$. \par
|
% maybe fix later?
|
||||||
\note{If you don't understand what this says, ask an instructor. \\ This is the reason we did the last few problems!}
|
%
|
||||||
|
%Look through the above problems and convince yourself of the following fact: \par
|
||||||
\begin{instructornote}
|
%If $a$ is a basis of $A$ and $b$ is a basis of $B$, $a \otimes b$ is a basis of $A \times B$. \par
|
||||||
\textbf{The idea here is as follows:}
|
%\note{If you don't understand what this says, ask an instructor. \\ This is the reason we did the last few problems!}
|
||||||
|
%
|
||||||
If $a$ is in $\{\texttt{0}, \texttt{1}\}$ and $b$ is in $\{\texttt{0}, \texttt{1}\}$,
|
%\begin{instructornote}
|
||||||
the values $ab$ can take are
|
% \textbf{The idea here is as follows:}
|
||||||
$\{\texttt{0}, \texttt{1}\} \times \{\texttt{0}, \texttt{1}\} = \{\texttt{00}, \texttt{01}, \texttt{10}, \texttt{11}\}$.
|
%
|
||||||
|
% If $a$ is in $\{\texttt{0}, \texttt{1}\}$ and $b$ is in $\{\texttt{0}, \texttt{1}\}$,
|
||||||
\vspace{2mm}
|
% the values $ab$ can take are
|
||||||
|
% $\{\texttt{0}, \texttt{1}\} \times \{\texttt{0}, \texttt{1}\} = \{\texttt{00}, \texttt{01}, \texttt{10}, \texttt{11}\}$.
|
||||||
The same is true of any other state set: if $a$ takes values in $A$ and $b$ takes values in $B$, \par
|
%
|
||||||
the compound state $(a,b)$ takes values in $A \times B$.
|
% \vspace{2mm}
|
||||||
|
%
|
||||||
\vspace{2mm}
|
% The same is true of any other state set: if $a$ takes values in $A$ and $b$ takes values in $B$, \par
|
||||||
|
% the compound state $(a,b)$ takes values in $A \times B$.
|
||||||
We would like to do the same with probabilistic bits. \par
|
%
|
||||||
Given bits $\ket{a}$ and $\ket{b}$, how should we represent the state of $\ket{ab}$?
|
% \vspace{2mm}
|
||||||
\end{instructornote}
|
%
|
||||||
|
% We would like to do the same with probabilistic bits. \par
|
||||||
|
% Given bits $\ket{a}$ and $\ket{b}$, how should we represent the state of $\ket{ab}$?
|
||||||
|
%\end{instructornote}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\pagebreak
|
\pagebreak
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -453,7 +451,7 @@ Consider the NOT gate, which operates as follows: \par
|
|||||||
\end{itemize}
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
What should NOT do to a probabilistic bit $[x_0, x_1]$? \par
|
What should NOT do to a probabilistic bit $[x_0, x_1]$? \par
|
||||||
If we return to our coin analogy, we can think of the NOT operation as
|
If we return to our coin analogy, we can think of the NOT operation as
|
||||||
flipping a coin we have already tossed, without looking at it's state.
|
flipping a coin we have already tossed, without looking at its state.
|
||||||
Thus,
|
Thus,
|
||||||
\begin{equation*}
|
\begin{equation*}
|
||||||
\text{NOT} \begin{bmatrix}
|
\text{NOT} \begin{bmatrix}
|
||||||
@ -544,8 +542,8 @@ Find the matrix that represents the NOT operation on one probabilistic bit.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\problem{Extension by linearity}
|
\problem{Extension by linearity}
|
||||||
Say we have an arbitrary operation $A$. \par
|
Say we have an arbitrary operation $M$. \par
|
||||||
If we know how $A$ acts on $[1]$ and $[0]$, can we compute $A[x]$ for an arbitrary state $[x]$? \par
|
If we know how $M$ acts on $[1]$ and $[0]$, can we compute $M[x]$ for an arbitrary state $[x]$? \par
|
||||||
Say $[x] = [x_0, x_1]$.
|
Say $[x] = [x_0, x_1]$.
|
||||||
\begin{itemize}
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
\item What is the probability we observe $0$ when we measure $x$?
|
\item What is the probability we observe $0$ when we measure $x$?
|
||||||
|
@ -42,11 +42,11 @@ the following holds: \par
|
|||||||
Consider the \textit{controlled not} (or \textit{cnot}) gate, defined by the following table: \par
|
Consider the \textit{controlled not} (or \textit{cnot}) gate, defined by the following table: \par
|
||||||
\begin{itemize}
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
\item $\text{X}_\text{c}\ket{00} = \ket{00}$
|
\item $\text{X}_\text{c}\ket{00} = \ket{00}$
|
||||||
\item $\text{X}_\text{c}\ket{01} = \ket{11}$
|
\item $\text{X}_\text{c}\ket{01} = \ket{01}$
|
||||||
\item $\text{X}_\text{c}\ket{10} = \ket{10}$
|
\item $\text{X}_\text{c}\ket{10} = \ket{11}$
|
||||||
\item $\text{X}_\text{c}\ket{11} = \ket{01}$
|
\item $\text{X}_\text{c}\ket{11} = \ket{10}$
|
||||||
\end{itemize}
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
In other words, the cnot gate inverts its first bit if its second bit is $\ket{1}$. \par
|
In other words, the cnot gate inverts its second bit if its first bit is $\ket{1}$. \par
|
||||||
Find the matrix that applies the cnot gate.
|
Find the matrix that applies the cnot gate.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{solution}
|
\begin{solution}
|
||||||
@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ If we measure the result of \ref{applycnot}, what are the probabilities of getti
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
\vfill
|
\vfill
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\problem{}
|
\problem{}<cnotflipped>
|
||||||
Finally, modify the original cnot gate so that the roles of its bits are reversed: \par
|
Finally, modify the original cnot gate so that the roles of its bits are reversed: \par
|
||||||
$\text{X}_\text{c, flipped} \ket{ab}$ should invert $\ket{a}$ iff $\ket{b}$ is $\ket{1}$.
|
$\text{X}_\text{c, flipped} \ket{ab}$ should invert $\ket{a}$ iff $\ket{b}$ is $\ket{1}$.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -34,6 +34,13 @@
|
|||||||
\subtitle{Prepared by \githref{Mark} on \today{}}
|
\subtitle{Prepared by \githref{Mark} on \today{}}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% TODO: spend more time on probabalistic bits.
|
||||||
|
% This could even be its own handout, especially
|
||||||
|
% for younger classes!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% Why are qubits amplitudes instead of probabilities?
|
||||||
|
% (Asher question)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{document}
|
\begin{document}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\maketitle
|
\maketitle
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user