Post-class fixes
This commit is contained in:
@ -31,9 +31,9 @@ A \textit{path} in a graph is a sequence of adjacent edges, \par
|
||||
In a directed graph, edges $a$ and $b$ are adjacent if $a$ ends at the node which $b$ starts at. \par
|
||||
\vspace{2mm}
|
||||
For example, consider the graph above. \par
|
||||
The edges $0$ and $1$ are not adjacent, because $0$ and $1$ both \textit{end} at $b$. \par
|
||||
$0$ and $2$, however, are: $0$ ends at $b$, and $2$ starts at $b$.
|
||||
$[0, 3, 2]$ is a path in the graph above, drawn below. \par
|
||||
The edges $1$ and $0$ are adjacent, since you can take edge $0$ after taking edge $1$. \par
|
||||
$0$ starts where $1$ ends. \par
|
||||
$0$ and $1$, however, are not: $1$ does not start at the edge at which $0$ ends.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\definition{}
|
||||
@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ still hold, but the following exceptions are allowed:
|
||||
\item There may be at most one node where $(\text{number in} - \text{number out}) = 1$
|
||||
\item There may be at most one node where $(\text{number in} - \text{number out}) = -1$
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\note[Note]{Either both exceptions occur, or neither occurs. Bonus problem: why?}
|
||||
We won't provide a proof of this theorem today. However, you should convince yourself that it is true:
|
||||
if any of these conditions are violated, why do we know that an Eulerian cycle (or path) cannot exist?
|
||||
|
||||
@ -276,6 +277,8 @@ Draw $G_4$.
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\end{solution}
|
||||
|
||||
\vfill
|
||||
|
||||
\problem{}<dbpath>
|
||||
Show that $G_4$ always contains an Eulerian path. \par
|
||||
\hint{\ref{eulerexists}}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user