Added Crypto & Lambda handouts
This commit is contained in:
67
Advanced/Lambda Calculus/parts/04 recursion.tex
Executable file
67
Advanced/Lambda Calculus/parts/04 recursion.tex
Executable file
@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
|
||||
\documentclass[../main.tex]{subfiles}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Recursion}
|
||||
|
||||
Say we want a function that computes the factorial of a positive integer. Here's one way we could define it:
|
||||
$$
|
||||
x! = \begin{cases}
|
||||
x \times (x-1)! & x \neq 0 \\
|
||||
1 & x = 0
|
||||
\end{cases}
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
We cannot re-create this in lambda notation. Functions in lambda calculus are \textit{anonymous}, which means we can't call them before they've been fully defined.
|
||||
|
||||
\vspace{1ex}
|
||||
|
||||
As an example, consider the statement $A = \lm a. A~a$ \\
|
||||
This means \say{write $(\lm a.A~a)$ whenever you see $A$.} However, $A$ is \textit{inside} what we're rewriting. We'd fall into infinite recursion before even starting our $\beta$-reduction!
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{instructornote}
|
||||
We're talking about recursion, and \textit{computability} isn't far away. At one point or another, it may be good to give the class a precise definition of \say{computable by lambda calculus:}
|
||||
|
||||
\vspace{4ex}
|
||||
|
||||
Say we have a device that reduces a $\lm$ expression to $\beta$-normal form. We give it an expression, and the machine simplifies it as much as it can and spits out the result. \\
|
||||
|
||||
\vspace{1ex}
|
||||
|
||||
An algorithm is \say{computable by lambda calculus} if we can encode its input in an expression that resolves to the algorithm's output.
|
||||
\end{instructornote}
|
||||
|
||||
\problem{}
|
||||
Write an expression that resolves to itself. \\
|
||||
\note{Your answer should be short and sweet.}
|
||||
|
||||
\vspace{1ex}
|
||||
|
||||
This expression is often called $\Omega$, after the last letter of the Greek alphabet. \\
|
||||
$\Omega$ useless on its own, but gives us a starting point for recursion.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{solution}
|
||||
$\Omega = M~M = (\lm x . xx) (\lm x . xx)$
|
||||
|
||||
\vspace{1ex}
|
||||
|
||||
An uninspired mathematician might call the Mockingbird $\omega$, \say{little omega}. \\
|
||||
\end{solution}
|
||||
|
||||
\vfill
|
||||
|
||||
\definition{}
|
||||
This is the \textit{Y-combinator}, easily the most famous $\lm$ expression. \\
|
||||
You may notice that it's just $\Omega$, put to work.
|
||||
$$
|
||||
Y = \lm f . (\lm x . f(x~x))(\lm x . f(x~x))
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
\problem{}
|
||||
What does this thing do? \\
|
||||
Evaluate $Y f$.
|
||||
|
||||
\vfill
|
||||
\pagebreak
|
||||
|
||||
\end{document}
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user